4.5 Article

First-in-human trial of the post-exposure tuberculosis vaccine H56:IC31 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected and non-infected healthy adults

期刊

VACCINE
卷 33, 期 33, 页码 4130-4140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.051

关键词

Tuberculosis; Vaccine; H56; Latent; Clinical trial

资金

  1. Aeras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: H56:IC31 is a candidate tuberculosis vaccine comprising a fusion protein of Ag85B, ESAT-6 and Rv2660c, formulated in IC31 adjuvant. This first-in-human, open label phase I trial assessed the safety and immunogenicity of H56:IC31 in healthy adults without or with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection. Methods: Low dose (15 mu g H56 protein in 500 nmol IC31) or high dose (50 mu g H56, 500 nmol IC31) vaccine was administered intramuscularly thrice, at 56-day intervals. Antigen-specific T cell responses were measured by intracellular cytokine staining and antibody responses by ELISA. Results: One hundred and twenty-six subjects were screened and 25 enrolled and vaccinated. No serious adverse events were reported. Nine subjects (36%) presented with transient cardiovascular adverse events. The H56:IC31 vaccine induced antigen-specific IgG responses and Th1 cytokine-expressing CD4(+) T cells. M.tb-infected vaccinees had higher frequencies of H56-induced CD4(+) T cells than uninfected vaccinees. Low dose vaccination induced more polyfunctional (IFN-gamma+TNE-alpha+IL-2(+)) and higher frequencies of H56-specific CD4+ T cells compared with high dose vaccination. A striking increase in IFN-gamma-only-expressing CD4+ T cells, displaying a CD45RA(-)CCR7(-) effector memory phenotype, emerged after the second high-dose vaccination in M.tb-infected vaccinees. TNF-alpha+IL-2(+) H56-specific memory CD4(+) T cells were detected mostly after low-dose H56 vaccination in M.tb-infected vaccinees, and predominantly expressed a CD45RA(-)CCR7(+) central memory phenotype. Our results support further clinical testing of H56:IC31. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据