4.6 Article

Optical spectra of Si nanocrystallites: Bethe-Salpeter approach versus time-dependent density-functional theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 78, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195423

关键词

Bethe-Salpeter equation; density functional theory; electron-hole recombination; elemental semiconductors; energy gap; excitons; infrared spectra; nanostructured materials; optical constants; quasiparticles; silicon; ultraviolet spectra; visible spectra

资金

  1. Austrian FWF [SFB25 IR-ON]
  2. European Community in the framework of the Network of Excellence NANOQUANTA [NMP4-CT-2004-500198]
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany [03SF0308]
  4. NIC Julich [HJN21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two state-of-the-art approaches based on the quasiparticle-Bethe-Salpeter equation (QP-BSE) and time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) for different functionals are applied to calculate optical-absorption spectra of Si nanocrystallites passivated with hydrogen. All-electron wave functions are generated within the projector-augmented wave method. The results of the two many-body approaches are used to discuss the interplay of quasiparticle, local-field (LF), and excitonic effects. The QP approach gives rise to blueshifts of the absorption spectra, whereas the LF effects and electron-hole exchange redistribute the oscillator strengths toward higher energies. The screened electron-hole attraction leads to slightly larger optical gaps than the ones found for independent particles described within the local-density approximation (LDA) for exchange and correlation (XC). The results within the TDDFT using the LDA kernel confirm the influence of LF effects. When a hybrid functional for XC is used, the TDDFT spectra show the same tendencies as the QP-BSE ones but still indicate a reduced electron-hole attraction. An effective-medium theory is used to examine the role of local fields due to the nanocrystal arrangement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据