4.5 Article

Nationwide population-based surveillance of invasive pneumococcal disease in Japanese children: Effects of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

期刊

VACCINE
卷 33, 期 45, 页码 6054-6060

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.069

关键词

Invasive pneumococcal disease; Japan; Seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; Children; Serotype replacement; Meropenem

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan [H19-iyaku-ippan-032, H22-shinko-shitei-021, H25-shinko-shitei-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In Japan, the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was introduced in 2010. PCV13 has replaced PCV7 since November 2013. Methods: The effectiveness of PCV7 in protecting against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children aged <5 years was evaluated in a nationwide active population-based surveillance of IPD in 2008-2013 in 10 prefectures in Japan. Results: 1181 cases were identified; 711 pneumococcal strains were analyzed for serotyping and antimicrobial resistance. Compared with the baseline IPD incidence (25.0 per 100,000), a 98% decline in IPD caused by PCV7 serotypes was found after the introduction of PCV7. This was partially offset by an increased incidence of IPD caused by PCV13 minus PCV7 and non-PCV13 serotypes, resulting in a 57% decline in overall IPD incidence. Absolute increases in the incidence rates of IPD caused by PCV13 minus PCV7 and non-PCV13 serotypes were 2.1 and 2.8 per 100,000 during the study period, respectively. The proportion of meropenem-nonsusceptible strains, especially with serotypes 19A and 15A, increased significantly after PCV7 introduction. Conclusions: Our data confirmed a 98% decline in IPD incidence caused by PCV7 serotypes in children aged <5 years and serotype replacement after PCV7 introduction. This shows the importance of continuing surveillance of serotypes responsible for IPD and their antimicrobial resistance in Japan. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据