4.6 Article

Keldysh approach for nonequilibrium phase transitions in quantum optics: Beyond the Dicke model in optical cavities

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.023831

关键词

-

资金

  1. US NSF [DMR-1103860]
  2. US Army Research Office [W911NF-12-1-0227]
  3. AFOSR MURI
  4. Packard Foundation
  5. DARPA OLE program
  6. DFG [Str 1176/1-1]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through SFB FOQUS [F4016-N16]
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through START Grant [Y 581-N16]
  9. European Commission (AQUTE, NAMEQUAM)
  10. Institut fur Quanteninformation GmbH
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Materials Research [1103860] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  14. Division Of Physics [969816, 1125846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y 581] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate nonequilibrium phase transitions for driven atomic ensembles interacting with a cavity mode and coupled to a Markovian dissipative bath. In the thermodynamic limit and at low frequencies, we show that the distribution function of the photonic mode is thermal, with an effective temperature set by the atom-photon interaction strength. This behavior characterizes the static and dynamic critical exponents of the associated superradiance transition. Motivated by these considerations, we develop a general Keldysh path-integral approach that allows us to study physically relevant nonlinearities beyond the idealized Dicke model. Using standard diagrammatic techniques, we take into account the leading-order corrections due to the finite number N of atoms. For finite N, the photon mode behaves as a damped classical nonlinear oscillator at finite temperature. For the atoms, we propose a Dicke action that can be solved for any N and correctly captures the atoms' depolarization due to dissipative dephasing. DOI: 10.1103/87.023831

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据