4.6 Article

Transient low-frequency fluctuations in semiconductor lasers with optical feedback

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.033820

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-07-1-0238]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [FIS2009-13360]
  3. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR), Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 1168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time-delayed systems often exhibit multistability of coexisting attractors, which can result in long chaotic transients on the way to one of the coexisting states. Strong enough noise can transform this transient chaos into noise-sustained dynamics. Here we study the interplay between delay-induced multistability, chaotic transients, and noise, in the case of a semiconductor laser with optical feedback from an external reflector. The time-delayed feedback renders the laser multistable, with a set of coexisting fixed points, and induces dynamical events called low-frequency fluctuations (LFFs), consisting of sudden intensity dropouts at irregular times. The deterministic Lang-Kobayashi model shows that, for a large range of realistic laser parameters, the LFFs are just a transient dynamics toward a stable fixed point. Here we analyze the statistical properties of the transient LFF dynamics and investigate the influence of various parameters. We find that realistic values of the noise strength do not affect the average transient time or its distribution, provided the model includes an explicit delay. On the other hand, nonlinear gain saturation has a strong effect: it increases both the duration of the LFF transients and the probability of noise-induced escapes from the stable fixed point. Our results suggest that the LFFs observed experimentally can be, at least in part, sustained by the interplay of noise and various nonlinear effects, which are phenomenologically represented by a gain saturation coefficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据