4.0 Article

IDENTIFYING HOTSPOTS OF RIP CURRENT ACTIVITY USING WAVELET ANALYSIS AT PENSACOLA BEACH, FLORIDA

期刊

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 32-49

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3646.33.1.32

关键词

nearshore bar; bar cycle; wavelet analysis; rip current; Pensacola Beach

资金

  1. National Park Service [P5320060026]
  2. Florida Sea Grant [R/C-S-50]
  3. Santa Rosa Island Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rip currents at Pensacola Beach in northwest Florida are associated with a transverse bar and rip morphology that develops as the nearshore bars migrate landward and weld to the beachface. As shown in a number of recent studies, the nearshore bar morphology at Pensacola Beach varies alongshore in response to a ridge and swale bathymetry on the inner-shelf, creating hotspots of rip current activity. However, it remains unclear whether these recently identified hotspots were present before Hurricane Ivan and if the development of the rip system is a response to the bar cycle. Wavelet analysis of aerial and satellite imagery from 1951 to 2004 was used to quantify the alongshore variation in bar morphology and identify when and where transverse bar and rip morphology develops in response to the storm-driven bar cycle. The innermost bar varies alongshore at a scale (of similar to 1000 m) that is consistent with the ridge and swale bathymetry, being closest to the beachface immediately landward of the deeper swales. As the bar migrates landward in the swales, it develops a variation with a length scale (of similar to 200 m) that is consistent with the spacing between rip currents. The transverse bar and rip morphology is found to preferentially develop at the primary beach access points where most drownings and rescues have historically taken place. The lack of a transverse bar and rip morphology landward of the ridges suggests that the bar cycle is rarely completed (with bar welding to the beachface) at those locations before the next hurricane or tropical storm moves it offshore.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据