4.6 Article

Structure stability and high-temperature distortion resistance of trilayer complexes formed from graphenes and boron nitride nanosheets

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 88-94

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp53343c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [9041674, CityU 118411]
  2. China National Natural Science Foundation [11172253]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China [12A001]
  4. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [14JJ2076]
  5. Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province and Aid Program for Science
  6. Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular dynamics was employed to study the structure stability and high-temperature distortion resistance of a trilayer complex formed by a monolayer graphene sandwiched in bilayer boron nitride nanosheets (BN-G-BN) and graphenes (G-G-G). The investigation shows that the optimal interlayer distances are about 0.347 nm for BN-G-BN and 0.341 nm for G-G-G. Analysis and comparison of the binding energy, van der Waals interactions between layers and radial distribution function (RDF) revealed that the BN-G-BN achieves a more stable combined structure than G-G-G. The interlayer graphene in the trilayer complex nanosheets, especially the graphene in BN-G-BN, is more integrated than monolayer graphenes in a crystal structure. The structures at high temperature of 1500 K show that the BN-G-BN exhibits less distortion than G-G-G; especially, fixing the atomic positions on up-down layers can obviously further reduce structural deformation of interlayer graphene. The result further indicates that the high-temperature distortion resistance of interlayer graphene in the trilayer complex is related to both material type and conditions of constraints at the up-down layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据