4.6 Article

Excited state dynamics of beta-carotene studied by means of transient absorption spectroscopy and multivariate curve resolution alternating least-squares analysis

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 15, 期 46, 页码 20026-20036

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp53323a

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAS
  2. NSFCs [21173235, 91233107, 21127003, 21333012]
  3. 973 Program [2013CB834604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determination of the excited-state dynamics of carotenoids has attracted considerable interest, engendering a number of controversial hypotheses because of the strongly overlapping spectral peaks and complicated dynamics of transient species. In the present work, aiming for better understanding the complexity of excited-state processes in carotenoids, excited-state dynamics of all-trans-beta-carotene in ethanol was investigated by femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy. Following the excitation of the strongly allowed S-2 state of the beta-carotene, transient absorption spectra were recorded in the visible spectral range. For comparison, the time-resolved transient absorption spectra are analyzed in a conventional way, fitting kinetic traces with a multi-exponential function at chosen wavelengths from obtained spectra, and then again by means of the soft-modeling multivariate curve resolution alternating least-squares analysis (MCR-ALS) method for modeling pure profiles and the generalized two-dimensional (2D) correlation spectroscopy data analysis for providing additional information on the dynamics of spectral features. MCR-ALS analysis shows that both the dynamics of the S* state, identified using the 2D correlation spectra, and the S-1 state develop on a different timescale than the relaxation of the vibrationally hot S-1v' state. Hot S-1v' and S* states are shown to have different species associated difference spectra. Results of our analysis indicate that the S* state observed in this work is not the hot S-1v' state but instead a separate singlet state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据