4.6 Article

Electrophoretic motion of a charged porous sphere within micro- and nanochannels

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 657-667

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp21938c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [97-2221-E-002-077-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrophoretic motion of a charged porous sphere within micro- and nanochannels is investigated theoretically. The Brinkman model and the full non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation are adopted to model the system, with the charged porous sphere resembling polyelectrolytes like proteins and DNA. General electrokinetic equations are employed and solved with a pseudo-spectral method. Key parameters of electrokinetic interest are examined for their respective effect as well as overall impact on the particle motion. We found, among other things, that the confinement effect of the channel can be so drastic that 75% reduction of particle mobility is observed in some situations for a poorly permeable particle. However, only 15% for the corresponding highly permeable particle due to the allowance of fluid penetration which alleviates the retarding shear stress significantly. In particular, an intriguing phenomenon is observed for the highly permeable particle: the narrower the channel is, the faster the particle moves! This was experimentally observed as well in the literature on DNA electrophoresis within nanostructures. The reason behind it is thoroughly explained here. Moreover, charged channels can exert electroosmosis flow so dominant that sometimes it may even reverse the direction of the particle motion. Comparison with experimental data available in the literature for some polyelectrolytes is excellent, indicating the reliability of this analysis. The results of this study provide fundamental knowledge necessary to interpret experimental data correctly in various microfluidic and nanofluidic operations involving bio-macromolecules, such as in biosensors and Lab-on-a-chip devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据