4.6 Article

Ionization energies and structures of lithium doped silicon clusters

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 8542-8550

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40465f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)
  2. KU Leuven Research Council
  3. Belgian Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on a combined experimental and theoretical study of the ionization energies and structures of small lithium doped silicon clusters, SinLim with n = 5-11 and m = 3-6. Photoionization efficiency curves are measured in the 4.68-6.24 eV range and subsequently compared with calculated values of both vertical and adiabatic ionization energies for the lowest energy isomers obtained using density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d) level. The evolution of the cluster geometries and ionization energies is studied as a function of the number of silicon and lithium atoms along the SinLi3 (n = 5-11) and Si8Lim (m = 1-6) series, respectively. For most studied sizes good agreement is found between the experimental and the calculated ionization energies for the lowest-energy isomer. In the SinLi3 (n = 5-11) series, positively charged lithium atoms surround a negatively charged silicon framework and mainly act as electron donors. Upon sequential lithium addition along the Si8Lim (m = 1-6) series, the Si-8 framework deforms from a rhombic (m = 0, 1) over a tetracapped tetragon (m = 1-4) to a square antiprism (m = 4-6) structure. Subsequent addition of lithium implies the addition of excess electrons to the silicon framework, which is reflected in a decrease of the ionization energy with increasing lithium content. This decrease is non-monotonous and odd-even alternations, reflecting the higher stability of clusters with an even number of electrons, are observed. In addition, post-threshold features in the experimental photoionization efficiency curves of SinLi3 (n = 8-11) may be related to the computed density of states of the corresponding lowest energy isomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据