Convergence of QM/MM free-energy perturbations based on molecular-mechanics or semiempirical simulations

Lately, there has been great interest in performing free-energy perturbation (FEP) at the combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) level, e. g. for enzyme reactions. Such calculations require extensive sampling of phase space, which typically is prohibitive with density-functional theory or ab initio methods. Therefore, such calculations have mostly been performed with semiempirical QM (SQM) methods, or by using a thermodynamic cycle involving sampling at the MM level and perturbations between the MM and QM/MM levels of theory. However, the latter perturbations typically have convergence problems, unless the QM system is kept fixed during the simulations, because the MM and QM/MM descriptions of the internal degrees of freedom inside the QM system are too dissimilar. We have studied whether the convergence of the MM -> QM/MM perturbation can be improved by using a thoroughly parameterised force field or by using SQM/MM methods. As a test case we use the first half-reaction of haloalkane dehalogenase and the QM calculations are performed with the PBE, B3LYP, and TPSSH density-functional methods. We show that the convergence can be improved with a tailored force field, but only locally around the parameterised state. Simulations based on SQM/MM methods using the MNDO, AM1, PM3, RM1, PDDG-MNDO, and PDDG-PM3 Hamiltonians have slightly better convergence properties, but very long simulations are still needed (similar to 10 ns) and convergence is obtained only if electrostatic interactions between the QM system and the surroundings are ignored. This casts some doubts on the common practice to base QM/MM FEPs on semiempirical simulations without any reweighting of the trajectories.