4.7 Article

Potential reduction in urban runoff by green spaces in Beijing: A scenario analysis

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 300-308

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.014

关键词

Curve number method; Rainwater management; Urban flooding; Urban planning

资金

  1. Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41230633]
  2. Innovation Project of the State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology of China [SKLURE2013-1-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban green space provides multiple ecological benefits, among which the reduction of rainfall runoff is important for sustainable urban development, particularly for cities experiencing severe flooding and water hazards. However, the effectiveness of urban green space in mitigating runoff has not been fully determined. We evaluated potential reductions in surface runoff associated with urban green space in central Beijing under a greening scenario using the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method. The results show that urban green space offers significant potential for runoff mitigation. In 2012, a total of 97.9 million m(3) of excess surface runoff was retained by urban green space; adding nearly 11% more tree canopy was projected to increase runoff retention by >30%, contributing to considerable benefits of urban rainwater regulation. At a more detailed scale, there were apparent internal variations. Urban function zones with >70% developed land showed less mitigation of runoff, while green zones (vegetation >60%), which occupied only 15.54% of the total area, contributed 31.07% of runoff reduction. Runoff reduction by urban green space, however, is influenced by many factors, such as rainfall, soil condition, and urban morphology. In regulating urban runoff, therefore, the priorities and integrating adaptive approaches to urban greening should be combined with compensatory and complementary measures. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据