4.6 Article

Structures and vibrational spectroscopy of partially reduced gas-phase cerium oxide clusters

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 13, 期 43, 页码 19393-19400

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp22129a

关键词

-

资金

  1. FELIX
  2. German Research Foundation (Center of Collaborative Research 546)
  3. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO)
  4. K.U. Leuven Research Council
  5. European Community [226716]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)
  8. Stiftung Stipendien-Fonds des Verbandes der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work demonstrates that the most stable structures of even small gas-phase aggregates of cerium oxide with 2-5 cerium atoms show structural motifs reminiscent of the bulk ceria. This is different from main group and transition metal oxide clusters, which often display structural features that are distinctly different from the bulk structure. The structures of Ce2O2+, Ce3O4+, and (CeO2)(m)CeO+ clusters (m = 0-4) are unambiguously determined by a combination of global structure optimizations at the density functional theory level and infrared vibrational predissociation spectroscopy of the cluster-rare gas atom complexes. The structures of Ce2O2+ and Ce2O3+ exhibit a Ce-O-Ce-O four-membered ring with characteristic absorptions between 430 and 680 cm(-1). Larger clusters have common structural features containing fused Ce-O-Ce-O four-membered rings which lead to intense absorption bands at around 500 and 650 cm(-1). Clusters containing a terminal Ce=O bond show a characteristic absorption band between 800 and 840 cm(-1). For some cluster sizes multiple isomers are observed. Their individual infrared signatures are identified by tuning their relative population through the choice of He, Ne or Ar messenger atoms. The present results allow us to benchmark different density functionals which yield different degrees of localization of unpaired electrons in Ce 4f states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据