4.6 Article

Heterogeneous oxidation kinetics of organic biomass burning aerosol surrogates by O-3, NO2, N2O5, and NO3

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 13, 期 47, 页码 21050-21062

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp22478f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ATM-0846255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reactive uptake coefficients (g) of O-3, NO2, N2O5, and NO3 by levoglucosan, abietic acid, nitroguaiacol, and an atmospherically relevant mixture of those species serving as surrogates for biomass burning aerosol have been determined employing a chemical ionization mass spectrometer coupled to a rotating-wall flow-tube reactor. g of O-3, NO2, N2O5, and NO3 in the presence of O-2 are in the range of 1-8 x 10(-5), <10(-6)-5 x 10(-5), 4-6 x 10(-5), and 1-26 x 10(-3), respectively, for the investigated organic substrates. Within experimental uncertainties the uptake of NO3 was not sensitive to relative humidity levels of 30 and 60%. NO3 uptake experiments involving substrates of levoglucosan, abietic acid, and the mixture exhibit an initial strong uptake of NO3 followed by NO3 gas-phase recovery as a function of NO3 exposure. In contrast, the uptake of NO3 by nitroguaiacol continuously proceeds at the same efficiency for investigated NO3 exposures. The derived oxidative power, i.e. the product of g and atmospheric oxidant concentration, for applied oxidants is similar or significantly larger in magnitude than for OH, emphasizing the potential importance of these oxidants for particle oxidation. Estimated atmospheric lifetimes for the topmost organic layer with respect to O-3, NO2, N2O5, and NO3 oxidation for typical polluted conditions range between 1-112 min, indicating the potential for significant chemical transformation during atmospheric transport. The contact angles determined prior to, and after heterogeneous oxidation by NO3, representative of 50 ppt for 1 day, do not decrease and thus do not indicate a significant increase in hygroscopicity with potential impacts on water uptake and cloud formation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据