4.6 Article

Photoselective excited state dynamics in ZnO-Au nanocomposites and their implications in photocatalysis and dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 13, 期 27, 页码 12488-12496

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp20892f

关键词

-

资金

  1. UGC
  2. CSIR
  3. DST [SR/SO/BB-15/2007, DST/INT/THAI/P06/2008]
  4. Unit in Nanoscience
  5. Centre of Excellence in Nanotechnology at the Asian Institute of Technology
  6. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC) belonging to the National Science & Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving the performance of photoactive solid-state devices begins with systematic studies of the metal-semiconductor nanocomposites (NCs) upon which such devices are based. Here, we report the photo-dependent excitonic mechanism and the charge migration kinetics in a colloidal ZnO-Au NC system. By using a picosecond-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) technique, we have demonstrated that excited ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) resonantly transfer visible optical radiation to the Au NPs, and the quenching of defect-mediated visible emission depends solely on the excitation level of the semiconductor. The role of the gold layer in promoting photolytic charge transfer, the activity of which is dependent upon the degree of excitation, was probed using methylene blue (MB) reduction at the semiconductor interface. Incident photon-to-current efficiency measurements show improved charge injection from a sensitizing dye to a semiconductor electrode in the presence of gold in the visible region. Furthermore, the short-circuit current density and the energy conversion efficiency of the ZnO-Au NP based dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) are much higher than those of a DSSC comprised of only ZnO NP. Our results represent a new paradigm for understanding the mechanism of defect-state passivation and photolytic activity of the metal component in metal-semiconductor nanocomposite systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据