4.6 Article

Six-dimensional dynamics study of reactive and non reactive scattering of H-2 from Cu(111) using a chemically accurate potential energy surface

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 6499-6519

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c001956a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCF
  2. CW/NWO PIONIER
  3. MICINN (Spain)
  4. DGI [FIS2007-60064]
  5. BSC-RES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the interaction of H-2 on Cu(111) using quasi-classical and quantum dynamics, and a chemically accurate six-dimensional potential energy surface (PES). The PES was computed using the specific reaction parameter (SRP) approach to density functional theory (DFT), in an implementation adapted to molecules interacting with metal surfaces. To perform this study we have applied the Born-Oppenheimer static surface (BOSS) approximation, i.e., we used both the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) and the static surface (SS) approximations. We show that our theoretical approach accurately describes experiments on dissociative adsorption, the effect of molecular vibrational and rotational motion on dissociative (associative) adsorption (desorption), and rotational excitation upon scattering. More specifically, dynamics calculations on reactive scattering of H-2 reproduce reaction probabilities measured in molecular beam experiments, effective barrier heights describing the dependence of reaction on the initial rovibrational state, and data on rotationally inelastic scattering with chemical accuracy (i.e., within 1 kcal mol(-1) approximate to 4.2 kJ mol(-1)). These processes are not affected much by surface motion, either because they were measured using a low surface temperature, T-s, or because the computed observable is independent of T-s. However, we show that to account for the dependence of molecular orientation on a reaction the inclusion of surface motion is required. We have also found that vibrational excitation is poorly described within the BOSS approximation, suggesting a breakdown of this approximation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据