4.6 Article

Synthesis, photoelectric properties and photocatalytic activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 28, 页码 8033-8041

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c002460k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB613303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20673049, 20703020, 20873053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts with different mass ratios of Fe2O3 vs. TiO2 were synthesized by impregnation of Fe3+ on the surface of TiO2 microrods and calcination at 300 degrees C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), photoluminescence spectra and X-ray diffraction (XRD) have been used to characterize the samples. The photocatalytic activities of Fe2O3/TiO2 heterocomposites, pure Fe2O3 and pure TiO2 were evaluated by the photodegrading efficiency of Orange II under visible light (lambda > 420 nm). The experiments demonstrated that Orange II in aqueous solution was more efficiently photodegraded using Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts than either pure Fe2O3 or TiO2 under visible light irradiation. With an optimal mass ratio of 7 : 3 in Fe2O3/TiO2 the highest rate of Orange II photodegradation was achieved under the experimental conditions. We have also compared the photoelectric properties of Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts with that of pure Fe2O3 by surface photovoltage (SPV) and transient photovoltage (TPV) techniques. Based on the photovoltage responses, we discussed the influence of the hetero-interface between Fe2O3 and TiO2 on transfer characteristics of photogenerated charge carriers. We demonstrated that the formation of heterojunctions between Fe2O3 and TiO2 for Fe2O3/TiO2 composites was pivotal for improving the separation and thus restraining the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes, which accounts for the enhancement of photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据