4.6 Article

Water formation at low temperatures by surface O-2 hydrogenation I: characterization of ice penetration

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 38, 页码 12065-12076

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00250j

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOVA, the Netherlands Research School for Astronomy
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO
  3. European Community [238258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water is the main component of interstellar ice mantles, is abundant in the solar system and is a crucial ingredient for life. The formation of this molecule in the interstellar medium cannot be explained by gas-phase chemistry only and its surface hydrogenation formation routes at low temperatures (O, O-2, O-3 channels) are still unclear and most likely incomplete. In a previous paper we discussed an unexpected zeroth-order H2O production behavior in O-2 ice hydrogenation experiments compared to the first-order H2CO and CH3OH production behavior found in former studies on hydrogenation of CO ice. In this paper we experimentally investigate in detail how the structure of O-2 ice leads to this rare behavior in reaction order and production yield. In our experiments H atoms are added to a thick O-2 ice under fully controlled conditions, while the changes are followed by means of reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS). The H-atom penetration mechanism is systematically studied by varying the temperature, thickness and structure of the O-2 ice. We conclude that the competition between reaction and diffusion of the H atoms into the O-2 ice explains the unexpected H2O and H2O2 formation behavior. In addition, we show that the proposed O-2 hydrogenation scheme is incomplete, suggesting that additional surface reactions should be considered. Indeed, the detection of newly formed O-3 in the ice upon H-atom exposure proves that the O-2 channel is not an isolated route. Furthermore, the addition of H-2 molecules is found not to have a measurable effect on the O-2 reaction channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据