4.6 Article

On the influence of strain on ion transport: microstructure and ionic conductivity of nanoscale YSZ|Sc2O3 multilayers

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 43, 页码 14596-14608

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp01018a

关键词

-

资金

  1. federal state of Hessen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multilayer samples of the type (YSZ vertical bar Sc2O3) x n with layer thicknesses between 8 nm (n=100) and 250 nm (n=5) were prepared on (0001) sapphire substrates by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The samples were characterised using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM/HRTEM, SAED (selected-area electron diffraction) and quantitative EELS (electron energy-loss spectroscopy)). The polycrystalline layers show a columnar microstructure, which is typical for the used preparation technique. The layers are highly textured and only one axial orientation relation is found between yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ), scandium oxide and the substrate: (0001) Al2O3 parallel to(111) Sc2O3 parallel to(111) YSZ A preferred orientation relationship also exists for the azimuthal rotation of the crystallites, which was demonstrated by SAED, XRD pole figure measurements and fast Fourier transformation (FFT) of HRTEM micrographs. The interfaces between YSZ, Sc2O3 and the substrate are sharp and do not contain diffuse transition regions. Dislocations appear not to be arranged in regular arrays. With increasing interface density (thinner individual layers in the multilayer), the conductivity of the multilayers decreases. We relate this to the negative nominal misfit present at the YSZ vertical bar Sc2O3 interfaces (compressive stress in YSZ at the phase boundaries). This observation agrees well with the previously investigated case of YSZ vertical bar Y2O3 (A. Peters et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 4623), where tensile misfit strain was present in YSZ at the phase boundaries, leading to a conductivity increase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据