4.6 Article

Codoping synergistic effects in N-doped SrTiO3 for higher energy conversion efficiency

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 27, 页码 7612-7619

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b922399a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB613302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10774091, 20973102, 10974118]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2007A18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the codoping synergistic effects in metal oxide semiconductors with wide band gaps as photocatalysts, we chose N-doped SrTiO3 as a host to determine the effects of some nonmetal and metal codopants on it by performing the first-principles calculations for N/H-, N/X-(X = F, Cl, Br, I), N/M-1- (M-1 = V, Nb, Ta) and N/M-2- (M-2 = Sc, Y, La) codoped SrTiO3. Our study shows that the codoping of N with nonmetal atoms H, F and all metal atoms except Ta can reduce the energy cost of N doping and thus improve the solubility of N in SrTiO3. Octahedra in codoped SrTiO3 suffer from a relative larger distortion than that of N-doped SrTiO3 and the distorted octahedra can generate a more efficient internal field, which can promote the separation and reduce the recombination of electron-hole pairs, due to the nonzero dipole moment of distorted octahedra. In the codoped structures, compensating vacancy defects can be avoided and narrowed band gaps without recombination centers (oxygen vacancies) can be realized (except the N/Sc-codoped SrTiO3 that shows a wider band gap than the pristine SrTiO3). The N related defect acceptor can be passivated resulting from electron transfer from donor to acceptor (DAP recombination). As photocatalysts, these defective-less codoped systems with narrowed band gaps should manifest high energy conversion efficiency under visible light irradiation. One should consider this passivated donor/acceptor dopants-codoping approach for exploiting new available visible light-driven photocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据