4.6 Article

A density functional investigation of thiolate-protected bimetal PdAu24(SR)(18)(z) clusters: doping the superatom complex

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 33, 页码 7123-7129

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b904491d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structure, electronic properties, optical absorption and charging properties of methylthiolate-protected bimetal PdAu24(SR)(18)(z) (R = Me) clusters with various charge states (-3 <= z <= + 3) are investigated by using density functional theory. The results are compared to properties of the well-understood singly anionic pure gold complex Au-25(SR)(18)((-1)) [J. Akola, M. Walter, H. Hakkinen and H. Gronbeck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 3756]. The atomic structure of this all-gold complex can be written in a divide-and-protect'' way [ H. Hakkinen, M. Walter and H. Gronbeck, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 9927] as Au-13[Au-2(SR)(3)](6)((-1)) where 6 v-shaped Au-2(SR)(3) ligands protect the close-to-icosahedral Au-13 core and where eight delocalized metal electrons, derived from Au(6s) electrons, comprise a stable closed-shell 1S(2)1P(6) superatom'' configuration in the core. We show that the di-anion PdAu24(SR)(18)((-2)) is a corresponding eight-electron closed-shell species whereas the clusters PdAu24(SR)(18)(z), -1 <= z <= + 3, have holes in the 1P HOMO manifold. This indicates that the doping Pd atom remains close to the zero-valent 4d(10)5s(0) configuration and does not contribute electrons to the delocalized electron density in the gold core. Structural optimization shows that the all-gold divide-and-protect'' structure motif is robust with respect to replacing the Au by Pd at the center of the core, at the surface of the core or in one of the protecting Au-2(SR)(3) ligands. However, optical absorption and the HOMO-LUMO and electrochemical gaps depend sensitively on the site of the doping Pd atom, which may turn out be useful for assigning the structure of PdAu24(SR)(18) from experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据