4.6 Article

Scaling form of viscosity at all length-scales in poly(ethylene glycol) solutions studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and capillary electrophoresis

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 40, 页码 9025-9032

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b908386c

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [TEAM/2008-2/2]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  3. Foundation for Polish Science
  4. Unilever company
  5. President of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  6. Human Frontier Science Program Organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measured the viscosity of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG 6000, 12 000, 20 000) in water using capillary electrophoresis and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with nanoscopic probes of different diameters (from 1.7 to 114 nm). For a probe of diameter smaller than the radius of gyration of PEG (e. g. rhodamine B or lyzozyme) the measured nanoviscosity was orders of magnitude smaller than the macroviscosity. For sizes equal to (or larger than) the polymer radius of gyration, macroscopic value of viscosity was measured. A mathematical relation for macro and nanoviscosity was found as a function of PEG radius of gyration, R(g), correlation length in semi-dilute solution, xi, and probe size, R. For R < R(g), the nanoviscosity (normalized by water viscosity) is given by exp(b(R/xi)(a)), and for R < R(g), both nano and macroviscosity follow the same curve, exp(b(R/xi)(a)), where a and b are two constants close to unity. This mathematical relation was shown to equally well describe rhodamine (of size 1.7 nm) in PEG 20 000 and the macroviscosity of PEG 8 000 000, whose radius of gyration exceeds 200 nm. Additionally, for the smallest probes (rhodamine B and lysozyme) we have verified, using capillary electrophoresis and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, that the Stokes-Einstein (SE) relation holds, providing that we use a size-dependent viscosity in the formula. The SE relation is correct even in PEG solutions of very high viscosity (three orders of magnitude larger than that of water).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据