4.7 Article

Inhibition of TGFβ type I receptor activity facilitates liver regeneration upon acute CCl4 intoxication in mice

期刊

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 347-357

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-014-1436-y

关键词

Acute hepatotoxicity; CCl4; Regeneration; ALK5; LY364947; TGF beta; Smad

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-MW)
  2. Netherlands Institute for Regenerative Medicine (NIRM)
  3. Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) IT-Liver grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver exhibits a remarkable maintenance of functional homeostasis in the presence of a variety of damaging toxic factors. Tissue regeneration involves cell replenishment and extracellular matrix remodeling. Key regulator of homeostasis is the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) cytokine. To understand the role of TGF beta during liver regeneration, we used the single-dose carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) treatment in mice as a model of acute liver damage. We combined this with in vivo inhibition of the TGF beta pathway by a small molecule inhibitor, LY364947, which targets the TGF beta type I receptor kinase [activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5)] in hepatocytes but not in activated stellate cells. Co-administration of LY364947 inhibitor and CCl4 toxic agent resulted in enhanced liver regeneration; cell proliferation (measured by PCNA, phosphorylated histone 3, p21) levels were increased in CCl4 + LY364947 versus CCl4-treated mice. Recovery of CCl4-metabolizing enzyme CYP2E1 expression in hepatocytes is enhanced 7 days after CCl4 intoxication in the mice that received also the TGF beta inhibitor. In summary, a small molecule inhibitor that blocks ALK5 downstream signaling and halts the cytostatic role of TGF beta pathway results in increased cell regeneration and improved liver function during acute liver damage. Thus, in vivo ALK5 modulation offers insight into the role of TGF beta, not only in matrix remodeling and fibrosis, but also in cell regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据