4.6 Article

An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 279-285

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14714

关键词

Doppler; fetal growth restriction; management; perinatal complications; small-for-gestational age

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (Spain) [PI/060347]
  2. Cerebra Foundation (Carmarthen, Wales, UK)
  3. Thrasher Research Fund (Salt Lake City, USA)
  4. 'Fundacio la Caixa'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To develop an integrated model with the best performing criteria for predicting adverse outcome in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) pregnancies. Methods A cohort of 509 pregnancies with a suspected SGA fetus, eligible for trial of labor, was recruited prospectively and data on perinatal outcome were recorded. A predictive model for emergency Cesarean delivery because of non-reassuring fetal status or neonatal acidosis was constructed using a decision tree analysis algorithm, with predictors: maternal age, body mass index, smoking, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, onset of labor (induced vs spontaneous), estimated fetal weight (EFW), umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), mean uterine artery (UtA) PI, fetal middle cerebral artery PI and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR). Results An adverse outcome occurred in 134 (26.3%) cases. The best performing predictors for defining a high risk for adverse outcome in SGA fetuses was the presence of a CPR < 10th centile, a mean UtA-PI > 95th centile or an EFW < 3rd centile. The algorithm showed a sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for adverse outcome of 82.8% (95% CI, 75.1-88.6%), 47.7% (95% CI, 42.6-52.9%), 36.2% (95% CI, 30.8-41.8%) and 88.6% (95% CI, 83.2-92.5%), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.58 and 0.36. Conclusions Our model could be used as a diagnostic tool for discriminating SGA pregnancies at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Copyright (C) 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据