4.6 Article

Observation of intramolecular singlet and triplet excimers of tethered naphthalene moieties under the geometric constraints imposed by the host framework of zeolites

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 21, 页码 3124-3130

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b800803e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the emission spectroscopic investigation of singlet and triplet excimers of tethered bisnaphthalene species at room temperature. 1,1'-Dinaphthylethane (DNE) and 1,1'-dinaphthylpropane (DNP) were incorporated into a 3-D network of a 1.3 nm diameter pseudospherical supercage of zeolites Y (with an entry aperture of 0.74 nm), and a 1-D channel of zeolite L with a 0.71 nm aperture. In the straight channel of zeolite L, DNP adopts a parallel-sandwich conformation as suggested by the observation of entirely excimeric fluorescence, while DNE can only enter the channel in an open form. As a result, incorporation of DNP into zeolite L exchanged with Tl(+) ions, which induce enhanced intersystem-crossing, allowed the observation of a broad and featureless phosphorescence spectrum that is ascribable to the triplet excimer of DNP. In contrast, an entirely monomeric phosphorescence is observed for DNE. Furthermore, we observed a monomeric phosphorescence spectrum for DNP in Tl(+) -exchanged zeolite Y, in which DNP was shown to assume its open conformation. Thus the parallel-sandwich structure is responsible for the triplet excimer of the bisnaphthalene species as well as for the singlet counterpart. The parallel-sandwich conformation of the triplet excimer of DNP immobilized by the host framework is significantly different from the previously proposed L-shaped configuration in solution. However, it is very similar to that of the triplet excimer of triple-tethered carbazolophane, as revealed quite recently by Ohkita's group (J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 10905). Thus the present study helps tackle the long-term issue of triplet excimer through the use of zeolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据