4.3 Article

A reconsideration of the thermodynamics of phase-change switching

期刊

PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI B-BASIC SOLID STATE PHYSICS
卷 249, 期 10, 页码 1932-1938

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201200350

关键词

entropy; PCRAM; phase-change memory; superlattices

资金

  1. NEDO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase-change random access memory (PCRAM) holds great promise as a future non-volatile memory technology. All PCRAM devices have an inextricable relationship with thermodynamics. To make a memory cell crystallize or amorphize by injecting and removing thermal energy as a repetitive memory cycle results in the generation of entropy. In the study and development of PCRAM, the entropic part in the total energy has been neglected in the thermo-dynamical system. In this paper, we discuss entropic energy losses through simple calculations based on the SackurTetrode equation and compare the results with those obtained by first-principles computer simulations. In addition, using a structure specific entropy generation model, we verify how much input energy is wasted in phase-change memory cells fabricated with a Ge2Sb2Te5 alloy-layer or a simulation optimized [(GeTe)2(Sb2Te3)4]7 multilayer structure. According to a detailed analysis, the entropy derived from application of the SackurTetrode equation is in good agreement with results derived from first-principles simulations. Our experimental device fabricated using an entropy-controlled phase-change design resulted in significant efficiency improvements. Relative to a Ge2Sb2Te5 alloy-layer device, the new multilayer device exhibited a 82% improvement in energy efficiency for a transition from the high- to the low-resistivity state and with a 64% improvement in efficiency for a transition from the low- to the high-resistivity state. This new entropic-energy-loss optimized device was able to return to the high-resistivity state at approximately the same current as that required for the low-resistivity state of the alloy device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据