4.4 Article

Characterization of the surface acoustic wave devices based on ZnO/nanocrystalline diamond structures

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201228631

关键词

diamond; nanocrystalline materials; sputtering; surface acoustic waves; thin films; ZnO

资金

  1. Scottish Sensing Systems Centre (S3C)
  2. Royal Society [RG090609]
  3. Carnegie Trust
  4. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  5. Royal Academy of Engineering-Research Exchanges with China and India Awards
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZYGX2009J046, ZYGX2009x007]
  7. Sichuan Young Scientists Foundation [2010JQ0006]
  8. EPSRC [EP/F063865/1, EP/F06294X/1]
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F063865/1, EP/F06294X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/F063865/1, EP/F06294X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocrystalline ZnO films with strong (0002) texture and fine grains were deposited onto ultra-nanocrystalline diamond (UNCD) layers on silicon using high target utilization sputtering technology. The unique characteristic of this sputtering technique allows room temperature growth of smooth ZnO films with a low roughness and low stress at high growth rates. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices were fabricated on ZnO/UNCD structure and exhibited good transmission signals with a low insertion loss and a strong side-lobe suppression for the Rayleigh mode SAW. Based on the optimization of the layered structure of the SAW device, a good performance with a coupling coefficient of 5.2% has been realized, promising for improving the microfluidic efficiency in droplet transportation comparing with that of the ZnO/Si SAW device. An optimized temperature coefficient of frequency of -23.4ppm degrees C-1 was obtained for the SAW devices with the 2.72 mu m-thick ZnO and 1.1 mu m-thick UNCD film. Significant thermal effect due to the acoustic heating has been redcued which is related to the temperature stability of the ZnO/UNCD SAW device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据