4.6 Article

Characterization of 13.56 MHz RF Ne-N2 mixture plasma using intrusive and non-intrusive diagnostic techniques

期刊

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/88/04/045503

关键词

-

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) [20-1789/RD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RF generated Ne-N-2 mixture plasmas are investigated to evaluate the variation in electron temperature (T-e) and vibrational temperature (T-nu) of the ground state N-2(X, nu), the second positive system N-2(C-3 Pi(u), nu' -> B-3 Pi(g), nu '') and the first negative system N-2(+)(B-2 Sigma(+)(u), nu' -> X-2 Sigma(+)(g), nu '') of nitrogen; the electron energy probability function and the population densities of the reactive atomic, molecular and ionic species of nitrogen; and the rotational temperature (T-rot) of the first negative system of N-2(+)(B-2 Sigma(+)(u)) nitrogen, as a function of discharge parameters. Optical emission spectroscopy and a Langmuir probe are employed to characterize the plasmas. It is observed that the density of reactive species and T-e, as well as T-nu (the second positive and first negative system), increase with RF power and neon percentage in the mixture. However, T-e decreases with total pressure while T-nu (the second positive and first negative system) increases up to a pressure of 0.5 mbar. The vibrational temperature of the N-2(X, nu) state has been measured indirectly through the N-2(C-3 Pi(u)) state distribution, and it is noted that it increases up to 60% neon in the mixture and then decreases. On the other hand, the density of the reactive species corresponding to atomic nitrogen increases with increase in neon percentage, and after reaching an optimum value, starts to decrease. The rotational temperature of the first negative system N-2(+)(B-2 Sigma(+)(u)) of nitrogen has been measured using the Boltzmann plot method and it is observed that it increases gradually up to 60% neon in the mixture and then falls slightly at 0.5 mbar pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据