4.7 Article

Enhancement and inhibition effects of water matrices during the sonochemical degradation of the antibiotic dicloxacillin

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 211-219

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.07.006

关键词

Dicloxacillin; Water treatment; Advanced oxidation process; Ultrasound; Water matrix

资金

  1. Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (Colciencias, Colombia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sonochemical degradation of dicloxacillin (DXC) was studied in both synthetic and natural waters. Degradation routes and the effect of experimental conditions such as pH, initial DXC concentration and ultrasonic power were evaluated. Experiments were carried out with a fixed frequency (600 kHz). The best performances were achieved using acidic media (pH = 3) and high power (60 W). The degradation process showed pseudo-first order kinetics as described by the Okitsu model. To evaluate water matrix effects, substrate degradation, in the presence of Fe2+ and organic compounds such as glucose and 2-propanol, was studied. A significant improvement was achieved with Fe2+ (1.0 mM). Inhibition of the degradation process was observed at a relatively high concentration of 2-propanol (4.9 mM), while glucose did not show any effect. Natural water showed an interesting effect: for a low concentration of DXC (6.4 mu M), an improvement in the degradation process was observed, while at a higher concentration of DXC (0.43 mM), degradation was inhibited. Additionally, the extent of degradation of the process was evaluated through the analysis of chemical oxygen demand (COD), antimicrobial activity, total organic carbon (TOC) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5). A 30% removal of COD was achieved after the treatment and no change in the TOC was observed. Antimicrobial activity was eliminated after 360 min of ultrasonic treatment. After 480 min of treatment, a biodegradable solution was obtained. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据