4.3 Article

Novel superconducting characteristics and unusual normal-state properties in iron-based pnictide superconductors: 57FeNMR and 75AsNQR/NMR studies in REFeAsO1-y (RE = La, Pr, Nd) and Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2

期刊

PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS
卷 469, 期 9-12, 页码 559-565

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2009.03.009

关键词

Superconductivity; Iron-based pnictide; LaFeAsO; (Ba,K)Fe2As2; NMR; NQR

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [20001004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss the novel superconducting characteristics and unusual normal-state properties of iron (Fe)-based pnictide superconductors REFeAsO1-y (RE = La, Pr, Nd) and Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 (T-c = 38 K) by means of (FeNMR)-Fe-57 and (75)AsNQR/NMR. In the superconducting state of LaFeAsO0.7 (T-c = 28 K), the spin component of the Fe-57-Knight shift decreases to almost zero at low temperatures, which provide firm evidence of the Superconducting state formed by spin-singlet Cooper pairing. The nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rates (1/T-1) in LaFeAsO0.7 and Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 exhibit a T-3-like dependence without a coherence peak just below T-c, indicating that an unconventional superconducting state is commonly realized in these Fe-based pnictide compounds. All these events below T-c are consistently argued in terms of an extended s(+/-)-wave pairing with a sign reversal of the order parameter-among Fermi surfaces. In the normal state, 1/T1T decreases remarkably upon cooling for both the Fe and As sites of LaFeAsO0.7. In contrast, it gradually increases upon cooling in Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2. Despite the similarity between the superconducting properties of these compounds, a crucial difference was observed in their normal-state properties depending on whether electrons or holes are doped into the FeAs layers. These results may provide some hint to address a possible mechanism of Fe-based pnictide superconductors. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据