4.3 Article

Effect of nitrogen application and elevated CO2 on photosynthetic gas exchange and electron transport in wheat leaves

期刊

PHOTOSYNTHETICA
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 593-602

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-013-0059-5

关键词

CO2 concentration; electron transport rate and partitioning; nitrogen availability

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [30800668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen (N) availability is a critical factor affecting photosynthetic acclimation of C-3 plants under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2](e)). However, current understanding of N effects on photosynthetic electron transport rate and partitioning, as well as its impact on photosynthesis under [CO2](e), is inadequate. Using controlled environment open-top chambers, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown at two N levels (0 and 200 mg(N) kg(-1) soil) and two atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 400 ([CO2](a)) and 760 mu mol mol(-1)([CO2](e)) during 2009 and 2010. Under [CO2](e) high N availability increased stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, reduced limitations on the activity of triose phosphate isomerase, a Calvin cycle enzyme, and increased the rate of net photosynthesis (P (N)). Considering photosynthetic electron transport rate and partitioning aspects, we suggest that greater N availability increased P (N) under [CO2](e) due to four following reasons: (1) higher N availability enhanced foliar N and chlorophyll concentrations, and the actual photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS) II reaction centers under irradiance increased, (2) increase of total electron transport rate and proportion of open PSII reaction centers, (3) enhancement of the electron transport rate of the photochemical and carboxylation processes, and (4) reduced limitations of the Calvin cycle enzymes on the photosynthetic electron transport rate. Consequently, sufficient N improved light energy utilization in wheat flag leaves under [CO2](e), thus benefiting to photosynthetic assimilation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据