4.4 Article

Structure-based simulation of linear optical spectra of the CP43 core antenna of photosystem II

期刊

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
卷 111, 期 1-2, 页码 87-101

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-011-9675-8

关键词

Chlorophyll; Electrostatic interaction; Excitation energy transfer; Lipids; Mutagenesis; Optical spectra

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 429 (TP A9)]
  2. JKU Linz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The linear optical spectra (absorbance, linear dichroism, circular dichroism, fluorescence) of the CP43 (PsbC) antenna of the photosystem II core complex (PSIIcc) pertaining to the S-0 -> S-1(QY) transitions of the chlorophyll (Chl) a pigments are simulated by applying a combined quantum chemical/electrostatic method to obtain excitonic couplings and local transition energies (site energies) on the basis of the 2.9 angstrom resolution crystal structure (Guskov et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 334-342, 2009). The electrostatic calculations identify three Chls with low site energies (Chls 35, 37, and 45 in the nomenclature of Loll et al. (Nature 438: 1040-1044, 2005). Arefined simulation of experimental spectra of isolated CP43 suggests a modified set of site energies within 143 cm(-1) of the directly calculated values (root mean square deviation: 80 cm(-1)). In the refined set, energy sinks are at Chls 37, 43, and 45 in agreement with earlier fitting results (Raszewski and Renger, J Am Chem Soc 130: 4431-4446, 2008). The present structure-based simulations reveal that a large part of the redshift of Chl 37 is due to a digalactosyldiacylglycerol lipid. This finding suggests a new role for lipids in PSIIcc, namely the tuning of optical spectra and the creation of an excitation energy funnel towards the reaction center. The analysis of electrostatic pigment-protein interactions is used to identify amino acid residues that are of potential interest for an experimental approach to an assignment of site energies and energy sinks by site-directed mutagenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据