4.4 Article

Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 209-214

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-010-9606-0

关键词

Arabidopsis; Calibration curve; Chlorophyll content; Chloroplast development; SPAD meter

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/D016541/1, BB/F020325/1, BB/H008039/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/D016541/1, BB/H008039/1, BB/F020325/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F020325/1, BB/H008039/1, BB/D016541/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SPAD-502 meter is a hand-held device that is widely used for the rapid, accurate and non-destructive measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentrations. It has been employed extensively in both research and agricultural applications, with a range of different plant species. However, its utility has not been fully exploited in relation to the most intensively studied model organism for plant science research, Arabidopsis thaliana. Measurements with the SPAD-502 meter produce relative SPAD meter values that are proportional to the amount of chlorophyll present in the leaf. In order to convert these values into absolute units of chlorophyll concentration, calibration curves must be derived and utilized. Here, we present calibration equations for Arabidopsis that can be used to convert SPAD values into total chlorophyll per unit leaf area (nmol/cm(2); R (2) = 0.9960) or per unit fresh weight of leaf tissue (nmol/mg; R (2) = 0.9809). These relationships were derived using a series of Arabidopsis chloroplast biogenesis mutants that exhibit chlorophyll deficiencies of varying severity, and were verified by the subsequent analysis of senescent or light-stressed leaves. Our results revealed that the converted SPAD values differ from photometric measurements of solvent-extracted chlorophyll by just similar to 6% on average.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据