期刊
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING
卷 77, 期 8, 页码 825-838出版社
AMER SOC PHOTOGRAMMETRY
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.77.8.825
关键词
-
As third-party lidar software manufacturers are increasingly adding support for full-waveform data, a common question is which algorithm(s) to implement. To this end, a new approach is needed to compare and contrast various lidar waveform processing strategies from a practical, operational perspective. Quality and type of information output, processing speed, suitability for particular applications, robustness against poor parameter selection, and more subjective measures related to user experience are of interest. This paper describes a new empirical method of comparing range extraction and discrimination performance of different algorithms, based on a ranging-lab setup with multiple, adjustable screen targets, with precisely-measured separations. We present the results of comparing three different algorithms described in the scientific literature. The results show distinct differences and also indicate that there is no one-size-fits-all approach: the choice of a specific algorithm and adjustable parameter settings are highly application-dependent.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据