4.4 Article

Water disinfection with Ru(II) photosensitisers supported on ionic porous silicones

期刊

PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 926-932

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1039/b902014d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTQ2006-15610C02- 01/ BQU]
  2. UCM [CCG07-UCM-AMB-2932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we report on the preparation, photochemical characterisation and evaluation of the photodisinfection power of various new types of singlet oxygen photosensitising materials prepared from two homoleptic Ru(II) complexes with polyazaheterocyclic ligands (abbreviated as RDP2+ and RSD4-) immobilised on anionic and cationic porous silicone polymers (pSil(-) and pSil(+), respectively). Time-resolved emission measurements in the UV-Vis-NIR have confirmed high O-1(2) production by these materials in water (tau(Delta) = 25-32 mu s) due to efficient quenching of the long-lived sensitiser triplet state by dissolved O-2, particularly in those pSil(-) materials with higher sensitiser load (P-O2(T) ca. 0.74 and 0.88 for 1.15 and 4.40 g m(-2), abbreviated as M and H, respectively). Photodisinfection tests carried out using both a solar-simulated lab-scale setup and under sunlight have demonstrated the strong bacteria inactivation ability of the RDP/pSil(-) material with the highest sensitiser load. Results of photochemical experiments with aqueous suspensions of Enterococcus faecalis at an initial concentration of 104 CFU mL(-1) yield average inactivation rates of 3200 and 24 000 CFU h(-1) for RSD/pSil(+) and H-RDP/pSil(-) films, respectively. The sensitiser charge, its load on the polymer support and the ionic character of the silicone surface play an essential role on the singlet oxygen production in heterogeneous media, the stability of the resulting material, and on the interaction with bacteria, determining the microorganism inactivation efficiency of the ionic silicone-based photosensitising materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据