4.6 Review

The importance of within-system spatial variation in drivers of marine ecosystem regime shifts

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0271

关键词

context-dependence; downscaling; predator-prey interaction; resilience; spatial heterogeneity; spatial scale

类别

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
  3. Research & Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
  4. 'PLAN FISH' project by Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  5. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management
  6. EU 7FP project PERSEUS [287600]
  7. EU 7FP project COCONET [287844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative analyses of the dynamics of exploited marine ecosystems have led to differing hypotheses regarding the primary causes of observed regime shifts, while many ecosystems have apparently not undergone regime shifts. These varied responses may be partly explained by the decade-old recognition that within-system spatial heterogeneity in key climate and anthropogenic drivers may be important, as recent theoretical examinations have concluded that spatial heterogeneity in environmental characteristics may diminish the tendency for regime shifts. Here, we synthesize recent, empirical within-system spatio-temporal analyses of some temperate and subarctic large marine ecosystems in which regime shifts have (and have not) occurred. Examples from the Baltic Sea, Black Sea, Bengula Current, North Sea, Barents Sea and Eastern Scotian Shelf reveal the largely neglected importance of considering spatial variability in key biotic and abiotic influences and species movements in the context of evaluating and predicting regime shifts. We highlight both the importance of understanding the scale-dependent spatial dynamics of climate influences and key predator-prey interactions to unravel the dynamics of regime shifts, and the utility of spatial downscaling of proposed mechanisms (as evident in the North Sea and Barents Sea) as a means of evaluating hypotheses originally derived from among-system comparisons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据