4.6 Article

Risk, mobility or population size? Drivers of technological richness among contact-period western North American hunter-gatherers

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0412

关键词

hunter - gatherers; western North America; technological richness; risk hypothesis; population-size hypothesis; mobility hypothesis

类别

资金

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
  5. Simon Fraser University
  6. University of Missouri
  7. National Science Foundation [1064534]
  8. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  9. Office Of The Director [1064534] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying factors that influence technological evolution in small-scale societies is important for understanding human evolution. There have been a number of attempts to identify factors that influence the evolution of food-getting technology, but little work has examined the factors that affect the evolution of other technologies. Here, we focus on variation in technological richness (total number of material items and techniques) among recent hunter-gatherers from western North America and test three hypotheses: (i) technological richness is affected by environmental risk, (ii) population size is the primary determinant of technological richness, and (iii) technological richness is constrained by residential mobility. We found technological richness to be correlated with a proxy for environmental risk-mean rainfall for the driest month-in the manner predicted by the risk hypothesis. Support for the hypothesis persisted when we controlled for shared history and intergroup contact. We found no evidence that technological richness is affected by population size or residential mobility. These results have important implications for unravelling the complexities of technological evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据