4.6 Review

Algal evolution in relation to atmospheric CO2: carboxylases, carbon-concentrating mechanisms and carbon oxidation cycles

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0212

关键词

inorganic carbon; mixing depth; photosynthetically active radiation; Rubisco; temperature; nutrients; UV radiation

类别

资金

  1. BBSRC UK
  2. NERC UK
  3. Fondazione Cariverona, Italy
  4. Southeast Wisconsin Energy Technology Research Center, USA
  5. Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry (MIPAF), Italy
  6. Australian Research Council
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygenic photosynthesis evolved at least 2.4 Ga; all oxygenic organisms use the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco)-photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle (PCRC) rather than one of the five other known pathways of autotrophic CO2 assimilation. The high CO2 and (initially) O-2-free conditions permitted the use of a Rubisco with a high maximum specific reaction rate. As CO2 decreased and O-2 increased, Rubisco oxygenase activity increased and 2-phosphoglycolate was produced, with the evolution of pathways recycling this inhibitory product to sugar phosphates. Changed atmospheric composition also selected for Rubiscos with higher CO2 affinity and CO2/O-2 selectivity correlated with decreased CO2-saturated catalytic capacity and/or for CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs). These changes increase the energy, nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, zinc and manganese cost of producing and operating Rubisco-PCRC, while biosphere oxygenation decreased the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and iron. The majority of algae today have CCMs; the timing of their origins is unclear. If CCMs evolved in a low-CO2 episode followed by one or more lengthy high-CO2 episodes, CCM retention could involve a combination of environmental factors known to favour CCM retention in extant organisms that also occur in a warmer high-CO2 ocean. More investigations, including studies of genetic adaptation, are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据