4.6 Review

New thinking, innateness and inherited representation

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0125

关键词

evolutionary psychology; innateness; inherited representation; genetic information; cognitive evolution; cultural inheritance

类别

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [086041]
  2. Oxford Martin School
  3. John Fell OUP Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据