4.6 Article

Individual-scale inference to anticipate climate-change vulnerability of biodiversity

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0183

关键词

biodiversity; climate change; forest dynamics; hierarchical models; model selection; risk analysis

类别

资金

  1. NSF [DDDAS054845, CDI0940671]
  2. Coweeta LTER
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Emerging Frontiers [1137364, 1137309] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0940671] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [823293, 0955904] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anticipating how biodiversity will respond to climate change is challenged by the fact that climate variables affect individuals in competition with others, but interest lies at the scale of species and landscapes. By omitting the individual scale, models cannot accommodate the processes that determine future biodiversity. We demonstrate how individual-scale inference can be applied to the problem of anticipating vulnerability of species to climate. The approach places climate vulnerability in the context of competition for light and soil moisture. Sensitivities to climate and competition interactions aggregated from the individual tree scale provide estimates of which species are vulnerable to which variables in different habitats. Vulnerability is explored in terms of specific demographic responses (growth, fecundity and survival) and in terms of the synthetic response (the combination of demographic rates), termed climate tracking. These indices quantify risks for individuals in the context of their competitive environments. However, by aggregating in specific ways (over individuals, years, and other input variables), we provide ways to summarize and rank species in terms of their risks from climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据