4.6 Article

Genomics of human longevity

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0284

关键词

human longevity; longevity genomics; epigenetics and ageing

类别

资金

  1. Innovation Oriented Research Programme on Genomics [IGE01014, IGE5007]
  2. Center for Medical Systems Biology (CMSB)
  3. Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for scientific research (NGI/NWO) [05040202, 050-060-810]
  4. Dutch Heart Foundation [NHS2006B195]
  5. The Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing [050 60810]
  6. EU [FP6 036894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In animal models, single-gene mutations in genes involved in insulin/IGF and target of rapamycin signalling pathways extend lifespan to a considerable extent. The genetic, genomic and epigenetic influences on human longevity are expected to be much more complex. Strikingly however, beneficial metabolic and cellular features of long-lived families resemble those in animals for whom the lifespan is extended by applying genetic manipulation and, especially, dietary restriction. Candidate gene studies in humans support the notion that human orthologues from longevity genes identified in lower species do contribute to longevity but that the influence of the genetic variants involved is small. Here we discuss how an integration of novel study designs, labour-intensive bio-banking, deep phenotyping and genomic research may provide insights into the mechanisms that drive human longevity and healthy ageing, beyond the associations usually provided by molecular and genetic epidemiology. Although prospective studies of humans from the cradle to the grave have never been performed, it is feasible to extract life histories from different cohorts jointly covering the molecular changes that occur with age from early development all the way up to the age at death. By the integration of research in different study cohorts, and with research in animal models, biological research into human longevity is thus making considerable progress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据