4.6 Article

Bayesian analysis of amino acid substitution models

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0175

关键词

phylogeny; Bayesian analysis; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Dirichlet process prior

类别

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-076040, R01 GM069801, GM-069801, R01 GM076040-03, R01 GM076040] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Models of amino acid substitution present challenges beyond those often faced with the analysis of DNA sequences. The alignments of amino acid sequences are often small, whereas the number of parameters to be estimated is potentially large when compared with the number of free parameters for nucleotide substitution models. Most approaches to the analysis of amino acid alignments have focused on the use of fixed amino acid models in which all of the potentially free parameters are fixed to values estimated from a large number of sequences. Often, these fixed amino acid models are specific to a gene or taxonomic group (e. g. the Mtmam model, which has parameters that are specific to mammalian mitochondrial gene sequences). Although the fixed amino acid models succeed in reducing the number of free parameters to be estimated-indeed, they reduce the number of free parameters from approximately 200 to 0-it is possible that none of the currently available fixed amino acid models is appropriate for a specific alignment. Here, we present four approaches to the analysis of amino acid sequences. First, we explore the use of a general time reversible model of amino acid substitution using a Dirichlet prior probability distribution on the 190 exchangeability parameters. Second, we then explore the behaviour of prior probability distributions that are 'centred' on the rates specified by the fixed amino acid model. Third, we consider a mixture of fixed amino acid models. Finally, we consider constraints on the exchangeability parameters as partitions, similar to how nucleotide substitution models are specified, and place a Dirichlet process prior model on all the possible partitioning schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据