4.5 Article

Extreme rainfall, vulnerability and risk: a continental-scale assessment for South America

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0408

关键词

climate change; extreme weather; flooding; vulnerability; risk; water security

资金

  1. UNESCO Regional Office for Science and Technology for Latin America
  2. Caribbean (ROSTLAC) [1007.4]
  3. City University of New York's Environmental CrossRoads Initiative
  4. University of New Hampshire's Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA-CREST) [NA06OAR4810162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extreme weather continues to preoccupy society as a formidable public safety concern bearing huge economic costs. While attention has focused on global climate change and how it could intensify key elements of the water cycle such as precipitation and river discharge, it is the conjunction of geophysical and socioeconomic forces that shapes human sensitivity and risks to weather extremes. We demonstrate here the use of high-resolution geophysical and population datasets together with documentary reports of rainfall-induced damage across South America over a multi-decadal, retrospective time domain (1960-2000). We define and map extreme precipitation hazard, exposure, affected populations, vulnerability and risk, and use these variables to analyse the impact of floods as a water security issue. Geospatial experiments uncover major sources of risk from natural climate variability and population growth, with change in climate extremes bearing a minor role. While rural populations display greatest relative sensitivity to extreme rainfall, urban settings show the highest rates of increasing risk. In the coming decades, rapid urbanization will make South American cities the focal point of future climate threats but also an opportunity for reducing vulnerability, protecting lives and sustaining economic development through both traditional and ecosystem-based disaster risk management systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据