4.5 Article

Impact of episodic vertical fluxes on sea surface pCO2

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0340

关键词

CO2; oceanic pCO(2); dissolved inorganic carbon; sea-surface variability; vertical mixing

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AL80G]
  2. Australian Climate Change Science Programme
  3. NASA [NNX08AL80G, 99211] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0928617] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [0928138] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Episodic events like hurricanes, storms and frontal-and eddy-driven upwelling can alter the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO(2)) at the sea surface by entraining subsurface waters into the surface mixed layer (ML) of the ocean. Since pCO(2) is a function of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), temperature (T), salinity and alkalinity, it responds to the combined impacts of physical, chemical and biological changes. Here, we present an analytical framework for assessing the relative magnitude and sign in the short-term perturbation of surface pCO(2) arising from vertical mixing events. Using global, monthly, climatological datasets, we assess the individual, as well as integrated, contribution of various properties to surface pCO(2) in response to episodic mixing. The response depends on the relative vertical gradients of properties beneath the ML. Many areas of the ocean exhibit very little sensitivity to mixing owing to the compensatory effects of DIC and T on pCO(2), whereas others, such as the eastern upwelling margins, have the potential to generate large positive/negative anomalies in surface pCO(2). The response varies seasonally and spatially and becomes more intense in subtropical and subpolar regions during summer. Regions showing a greater pCO(2) response to vertical mixing are likely to exhibit higher spatial variability in surface pCO(2) on time scales of days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据