4.5 Article

Multiscale, multiorgan and multivariate complexity analyses of cardiovascular regulation

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0267

关键词

cardiovascular system; multivariate approach; multiple organ disease; multiscale approach; risk stratification; cardiovascular genomics and proteomics

资金

  1. EU-FP7 Heart-Cycle [FP7-216695]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HO1634/9, HO 1634/12, Vo 505/8-1]
  3. German Ministry of Economics and Labour [AiF KF0566901NM7]
  4. Thuringian Ministry of Economics, Technology and Labour [Tab 2006FE0284]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular system complexity is confirmed by both its generally variegated structure of physiological modelling and the richness of information detectable from processing of the signals involved in it, with strong linear and nonlinear interactions with other biological systems. In particular, this behaviour may be accordingly described by means of what we call MMM paradigm (i.e. multiscale, multiorgan and multivariate). Such an approach to the cardiovascular system emphasizes where the genesis of its complexity is potentially allocated and how it is possible to detect information from it. No doubt that processing signals from multi-leads of the same system (multivariate), from the interaction of different physiological systems (multiorgan) and integrating all this information across multiple scales (from genes, to proteins, molecules, cells, up to the whole organ) could really provide us with a more complete look at the overall phenomenon of cardiovascular system complexity, with respect to the one which is obtainable from its single constituent parts. In this paper, some examples of approaches are discussed for investigating the cardiovascular system in different time and spatial scales, in studying a different organ involvement (such as sleep, depression and multiple organ dysfunction) and in using a multivariate approach via various linear and nonlinear methods for cardiovascular risk strati. cation and pathology assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据