4.7 Article

A tunnel face failure mechanism for layered ground, considering the possibility of partial collapse

期刊

TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 182-192

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2014.12.014

关键词

Face stability; Critical pressure; Limit analysis; Partial collapse

资金

  1. Fundacion Jose Entrecanales Ibarra
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BIA2012-34326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent rotational face collapse mechanism is extended to compute critical pressures, in the context of the upper-bound limit analysis, for tunnels in layered (or stratified) ground. The mechanism can consider both (i) cases in which contacts between layers intersect the tunnel face; and (ii) cases in which they are located above the tunnel crown. In addition, the mechanism is extended to address partial collapse in a two-layered ground (with a softer-top and a stronger-bottom), without the need to scale mechanisms that were derived for global collapse. A 3D numerical model is employed to validate the predictions of the limit analysis mechanism, demonstrating that it provides, with a significantly reduced computational effort, good predictions of critical pressure, of the type of collapse (global or partial), and of its geometry. The mechanism is then employed to conduct parametric studies of the influence of several geometrical and mechanical parameters on face instability, considering the possibility of partial collapse, of tunnels in layered soils. Results show that a weak material in the upper section of the tunnel face can lead to a significant increase of the collapse pressure; it also makes a partial collapse possible. They also show that, when partial collapse is not critical and a constant face pressure is considered, the lower layer has a stronger influence on the computed values of collapse pressure. Finally, the results of the proposed mechanism are compared to a recent limit analysis solution for layered soils. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据