4.4 Article

Charge-carrier and polaron hopping mobility in disordered organic solids: Carrier-concentration and electric-field effects

期刊

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
卷 90, 期 9, 页码 1229-1244

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786430903341394

关键词

charge carriers; disordered materials; hopping transport; mobility; organic semiconductors; polarons

资金

  1. National Academy of Science of Ukraine
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [M/125-2009]
  3. OAD [UA-10/2009]
  4. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effective-medium approximation (EMA) analytical theory is advanced further to describe charge transport at arbitrary charge-carrier concentration in a disordered organic material with superimposed polaron effects. A key point of this model compared to the previous treatment [Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 045210] is that it is formulated for arbitrary electric fields and is able to describe consistently both the carrier-concentration and field dependences of charge mobility. The mobilities of both bare charge carriers and polarons were calculated using the Miller-Abrahams and polaron jump rate models, respectively. An excellent quantitative agreement was obtained between the theoretical calculations and the recent numerical simulations of the field- and carrier-density dependences of the mobility for bare charge carriers using the same parameters. The polaronic carrier density effect was also calculated using the complete Marcus jump rate equation and straightforward EMA configurational averaging, and the results compared to that obtained with the use of the symmetrical jump rate model and the effective transport energy concept. This study confirms that a strong dependence of carrier mobility upon increasing carrier density and electric field, which has conventionally been observed in experiment for numerous organic semiconducting materials, is incompatible with the notion of large polaron binding energy in these materials, implying that the energetic disorder plays a dominant role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据