4.5 Article

Randomized Response Estimates for the 12-Month Prevalence of Cognitive-Enhancing Drug Use in University Students

期刊

PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 44-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/phar.1166

关键词

pharmacology; drug abuse; brain doping; academics; epidemiology

资金

  1. World Anti-Doping Agency [09M5]
  2. Initiative PRO Humanities and Social Sciences of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective To estimate the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use. Design Paper-and-pencil questionnaire that used the randomized response technique. Setting University in Mainz, Germany. Participants A total of 2569 university students who completed the questionnaire. Measurements and Main Results An anonymous, specialized questionnaire that used the randomized response technique was distributed to students at the beginning of classes and was collected afterward. From the responses, we calculated the prevalence of students taking drugs only to improve their cognitive performance and not to treat underlying mental disorders such as attention-deficithyperactivity disorder, depression, and sleep disorders. The estimated 12-month prevalence of using cognitive-enhancing drugs was 20%. Prevalence varied by sex (male 23.7%, female 17.0%), field of study (highest in students studying sports-related fields, 25.4%), and semester (first semester 24.3%, beyond first semester 16.7%). To our knowledge, this is the first time that the randomized response technique has been used to survey students about cognitive-enhancing drug use. Conclusion Using the randomized response technique, our questionnaire provided data that showed a high 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in German university students. Our study suggests that other direct survey techniques have underestimated the use of these drugs. Drug prevention programs need to be established at universities to address this issue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据