4.5 Review

Overview of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the nervous system

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 656-664

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.08.008

关键词

Glutamate; NMDA; AMPA; EAAT; Transporter; Metabotropic; Psychiatry

资金

  1. NIMH [R01 MH081211, T32 MH19961]
  2. Robert L. McNeil, Jr. Fellowship in Translational Research
  3. Abbott
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Evotec
  7. Eli Lilly Co.
  8. Hoffman La-Roche
  9. Johnson Johnson
  10. Novartis
  11. Novum Pharmaceuticals
  12. Merck Co.
  13. Sepracor Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This introductory article to the special edition on glutamate neurotransmission in neuropsychiatric disorders provides an overview of glutamate neurotransmitter system physiology and pharmacology. Glutamate was only relatively recently recognized as the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain, in part due to its ubiquitous nature and diverse metabolic roles within the CNS. The extremely high concentration of glutamate in brain tissue paired with its excitotoxic potential requires tight physiological regulation of extracellular glutamate levels and receptor signaling in order to assure optimal excitatory neurotransmission but limits excitotoxic damage. In order to achieve this high level of control, the system has developed a complex physiology with multiple regulatory processes modulating glutamate metabolism, release, receptor signaling, and uptake. The basic physiology of the various regulatory components of the system including the rich receptor pharmacology is briefly reviewed. Potential contributions from each of the system's components to the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric illnesses are briefly discussed, as are the many new pharmacological targets for drug development provided by the system, especially as they pertain to the proceeding preclinical and clinical articles in this issue. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据