4.5 Article

Blockade of metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibits cognition and neurodegeneration in an MPTP-induced Parkinson's disease rat model

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 64-71

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.03.022

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Dementia; Metabotropic glutamate receptor; MPEP; Cognition

资金

  1. National Science Council of the ROC [NSC 100-2410-H-040-003, NSC 100-2923-H-040-009-MY3]
  2. Chung Shang Medical University Hospital [CSH-2012-C-029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperactivity of the glutamatergic system is involved in excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD). Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) modulates glutamatergic transmission and thus has been proposed as a potential target for neuroprotective drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethyny1)-pyridine (MPEP), an mGluR5 antagonist, on working memory, object recognition, and neurodegeneration in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced PD rat model. Male Wistar rats were stereotaxically injected with MFTP into the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Starting 1 day after lesioning (day 1), the rats were treated daily with MPEP (2 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 14 days and rats underwent a T-maze test on days 8-10 and an object recognition test on days 12-14. MPTP-lesioned rats showed impairments of working memory in the T-maze test and of recognition function in the object recognition test and both effects were prevented by MPEP treatment Furthermore. MPTP lesion-induced dopaminergic degeneration in the nigrostriatal system, microglial activation in the SNc, and cell loss in the hippocampal CA1 area were all inhibited by MPEP treatment These data provide support for a role of mGluR5s in the pathophysiology of PD and suggest that MPEP is a promising pharmacological tool for the development of new treatments for dementia associated with PD. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据